Warning: Undefined array key "options" in /var/www/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/theme-builder/widgets/site-logo.php on line 93
Slingshot Native vs Pill Wakeboard Review

Slingshot Native vs Pill Wakeboard Review

Slingshot Native vs Pill Wakeboard Review

Classic models, renditions and high-tech boards always divide wakeboarders. Some practitioners made improvements on the best models that never get old. Other riders prefer to explore new paths or wakes, trying ultimate materials and designs—”Native”, the best version of classic “Recoil”, offering the essentials in wakeboarding. But “Pill” brings us a groundbreaking structure in Slingshot history. A head-to-head ride or comparison is required to decide which board is the best.

Slingshot Native Wakeboard 2022

A wakeboarder wants to maintain smooth transitions, but several boards present some channel discontinuity. This is a tricky issue with few effective solutions. “Native” reinterprets the “Recoil” model physics principles. The updated and improved structure of “Native” allows more buoyancy control in wake and park riding styles. This board was an eclectic creation by Alex Graydon.

Slingshot Native Wakeboard 2022

Hybrid Specific Design

Atomic Wood Core

Carbon Bedrock Inserts

Check Price EUR

  • Wakeboard size 138 cm | rocker size (in) 2.8 | waist width (cm) 44
  • Wakeboard size 144 cm | rocker size (in) 2.8 | waist width (cm) 44.5
  • Wakeboard size 150 cm | rocker size (in) 2.9 | waist width (cm) 45.3

Key Features

  • Build Quality

The build quality shows a perfect synergistic merge between wood and carbon fibre when it comes to the build quality. This merge helped obtain a tough but light structure. Besides the improved buoyancy control, the 0.7 mm ballistic base allows a good kinetic energy distribution during impacts after tricks.

  • Design

The build quality shows a perfect synergistic merge between wood and carbon fibre when it comes to the build quality. This merge helped obtain a tough but light structure. Besides the improved buoyancy control, the 0.7 mm ballistic base allows a good kinetic energy distribution during impacts after tricks.

  • Bindings

This table has a specific binding configuration. The KTV and RAD bindings work really well with this wakeboard.

Pros

  • Available on elliptical concave shape (reverse rocker from tip to tail).
  • Continuous rocker.
  • Wood and carbon fibre core.
  • Merged sidewall.
  • 0.7mm Ballistic base.
  • Stiff flex
  • For advanced-expert skill range.

Slingshot Pill Wakeboard 2022

“Pill” is quite different from “Native” and represents a new approach for high-end wakeboards. Extreme wakeboarders require sudden and explosive energy while carving on wakes. The NACA tech channels give the ultimate solution for a riding style with extra boost and control along with the stiff flex.

Slingshot Pill Wakeboard 2022

3-Stage Rocker Profile

Rigid Flex

Naca Tech Channels

Check Price in USD

The atomic wood core and carbon fibres integrate into a single tough structure. NACA channels increase traction with their sole curve shape. For this reason, increased flex is required under the stance position. The rigid-flex helps to gain pop and adapts to high landings. Asti Faivre offers us a unique color and wave design pattern for “Pill”. This wakeboard’s tough and daring character is defined in a masterful way.

  • Available in fuller tip shape (tip and tail shaped according with NACA tech channels).
  • Wakeboard size 142 cm | rocker size (in) 2.7 | waist width (cm) 44.2
  • Wakeboard size 138 cm | rocker size (in) 2.9 | waist width (cm) 43.2
  • Wakeboard size 138 cm | rocker size (in) 3 | waist width (cm) 44

Pros

  • Available on fuller tip shape (tip and tail shaped according to channel alignment).
  • 3-stage rocker.
  • Thinner profile.
  • Atomic wood core.
  • NACA tech channels.
  • Fusion sidewall.
  • Rigid-flex.
  • Fins’ edge enhancers.
  • Carbon fibres merged with the core.

Final thoughts / Conclusion

A fair comparison between “Native” and “Pill” is truly impossible. The “Recoil” update exceeds all the expectations and gives us an efficient response. “Native” is not a simple “remake”. This board’s elliptical concave shape, groundbreaking core, and ballistic base allow soft transitions and extreme performance.

But “Pill” also has a tough structure, stiff flex and a thinner profile. The safe but aggressive riding style is guaranteed. Nevertheless, “Native” allows more possibilities with wake and park riding styles and adaptability and endurance. The victory over “Pill” was narrowly achieved.